Roboguru
SD
SMP
SMA
UTBK/SNBT

UTBK/SNBT Bahasa Inggris: Pertanyaan, Jawaban, Latihan Soal & Pembahasan

Urutkan

Winafajria W

27 Januari 2022 03:33

Scientists are as obsessed with the question of why the super old survive and thrive as Ponce de Leon was theFountain of Youth. They want to understand why the Japanese islands of Okinawa are home to the world's largestpopulation of centenarians, with almost 600 of its 1.3 million inhabitants living into their second century–many ofthem are still active and looking decades younger than their actual years. Like weekend visitors on the summerferry to Martha’s Vineyard, scientists and sociologists block the boats to Sardina and Nova Scotia, Canada, to seewhy those craggy locales hide vast clusters of the super old. As well as studying these populations intensively to unlock their secrets, scientists have also taken a hard lookat the very old in the U.S., most notably in the New England Centenarian Study, led by Dr. Thomas Perls, ageriatrician at Boston University. While the very old are happy to offer homespun explanations for theirlongevity–"I never took a drink; "I drank a shot of whiskey every day"–experts are trying to unravel andunderstand the biological factors that allow some people to reach 100 while others drop off in their 70s or 80s.Researchers are particularly interested in determining which factors allow up to 30% of those who reach 100 to doso in sufficient mental and physical health: a whopping 90% of centenarians, according to Perls, remainfunctionally independent up to age 92. It is pretty obvious even to non-scientists that how you get there depends on the genes you are born with andlifestyle–what and how much you eat, where you live, and what types of stress and trauma you experience. Howmuch each of these factors contributes, though, was unknown until Swedish scientist tackled the problem in 1998they looked at a set of people who share genes but not lifestyle: identical twins who were separated at birth andreared apart. If genes were most important, you would expect the twins to die at about same age. In fact, they donot, and the average determined. The dominant factor is lifestyle. How is the information of the last paragraph the text organized? A. Each question is provided with an illustration. B. Scientific questions are followed by studies. C. Scientific questions are presented from general to specific. D. Each study is followed by research findings. E. Three related questions are followed by one finding.

3

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Septiangga S

27 Januari 2022 03:33

Scientists are as obsessed with the question of why the super old survive and thrive as Ponce de Leon was theFountain of Youth. They want to understand why the Japanese islands of Okinawa are home to the world's largestpopulation of centenarians, with almost 600 of its 1.3 million inhabitants living into their second century–many ofthem are still active and looking decades younger than their actual years. Like weekend visitors on the summerferry to Martha’s Vineyard, scientists and sociologists block the boats to Sardina and Nova Scotia, Canada, to seewhy those craggy locales hide vast clusters of the super old. As well as studying these populations intensively to unlock their secrets, scientists have also taken a hard lookat the very old in the U.S., most notably in the New England Centenarian Study, led by Dr. Thomas Perls, ageriatrician at Boston University. While the very old are happy to offer homespun explanations for theirlongevity–"I never took a drink; "I drank a shot of whiskey every day"–experts are trying to unravel andunderstand the biological factors that allow some people to reach 100 while others drop off in their 70s or 80s.Researchers are particularly interested in determining which factors allow up to 30% of those who reach 100 to doso in sufficient mental and physical health: a whopping 90% of centenarians, according to Perls, remainfunctionally independent up to age 92. It is pretty obvious even to non-scientists that how you get there depends on the genes you are born with andlifestyle–what and how much you eat, where you live, and what types of stress and trauma you experience. Howmuch each of these factors contributes, though, was unknown until Swedish scientist tackled the problem in 1998they looked at a set of people who share genes but not lifestyle: identical twins who were separated at birth andreared apart. If genes were most important, you would expect the twins to die at about same age. In fact, they donot, and the average determined. The dominant factor is lifestyle. Which of the following is true about the information in the text? A. Gene quality contributes much more to life span. B. Okinawa people look younger than their actual age. C. All alcoholic drinks decrease life expectation. D. All of Dr. Perl's subjects are self-reliant. E. Super old people normally can exceed 100.

4

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Tamiwin T

27 Januari 2022 03:33

Scientists are as obsessed with the question of why the super old survive and thrive as Ponce de Leon was theFountain of Youth. They want to understand why the Japanese islands of Okinawa are home to the world's largestpopulation of centenarians, with almost 600 of its 1.3 million inhabitants living into their second century–many ofthem are still active and looking decades younger than their actual years. Like weekend visitors on the summerferry to Martha’s Vineyard, scientists and sociologists block the boats to Sardina and Nova Scotia, Canada, to seewhy those craggy locales hide vast clusters of the super old. As well as studying these populations intensively to unlock their secrets, scientists have also taken a hard lookat the very old in the U.S., most notably in the New England Centenarian Study, led by Dr. Thomas Perls, ageriatrician at Boston University. While the very old are happy to offer homespun explanations for theirlongevity–"I never took a drink; "I drank a shot of whiskey every day"–experts are trying to unravel andunderstand the biological factors that allow some people to reach 100 while others drop off in their 70s or 80s.Researchers are particularly interested in determining which factors allow up to 30% of those who reach 100 to doso in sufficient mental and physical health: a whopping 90% of centenarians, according to Perls, remainfunctionally independent up to age 92. It is pretty obvious even to non-scientists that how you get there depends on the genes you are born with andlifestyle–what and how much you eat, where you live, and what types of stress and trauma you experience. Howmuch each of these factors contributes, though, was unknown until Swedish scientist tackled the problem in 1998they looked at a set of people who share genes but not lifestyle: identical twins who were separated at birth andreared apart. If genes were most important, you would expect the twins to die at about same age. In fact, they donot, and the average determined. The dominant factor is lifestyle. According to the information in the passage, people may ... A. Reach an old age if their parents do so. B. Not reach old age unless they live in areas where it is prevalent. C. Reach old age if they are brought up separately from their siblings. D. Fail to reach an old age' unless they are mentally healthy. E. Reach old age if they keep a healthy lifestyle.

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Nafis N

27 Januari 2022 03:33

Scientists are as obsessed with the question of why the super old survive and thrive as Ponce de Leon was theFountain of Youth. They want to understand why the Japanese islands of Okinawa are home to the world's largestpopulation of centenarians, with almost 600 of its 1.3 million inhabitants living into their second century–many ofthem are still active and looking decades younger than their actual years. Like weekend visitors on the summerferry to Martha’s Vineyard, scientists and sociologists block the boats to Sardina and Nova Scotia, Canada, to seewhy those craggy locales hide vast clusters of the super old. As well as studying these populations intensively to unlock their secrets, scientists have also taken a hard lookat the very old in the U.S., most notably in the New England Centenarian Study, led by Dr. Thomas Perls, ageriatrician at Boston University. While the very old are happy to offer homespun explanations for theirlongevity–"I never took a drink; "I drank a shot of whiskey every day"–experts are trying to unravel andunderstand the biological factors that allow some people to reach 100 while others drop off in their 70s or 80s.Researchers are particularly interested in determining which factors allow up to 30% of those who reach 100 to doso in sufficient mental and physical health: a whopping 90% of centenarians, according to Perls, remainfunctionally independent up to age 92. It is pretty obvious even to non-scientists that how you get there depends on the genes you are born with andlifestyle–what and how much you eat, where you live, and what types of stress and trauma you experience. Howmuch each of these factors contributes, though, was unknown until Swedish scientist tackled the problem in 1998they looked at a set of people who share genes but not lifestyle: identical twins who were separated at birth andreared apart. If genes were most important, you would expect the twins to die at about same age. In fact, they donot, and the average determined. The dominant factor is lifestyle. What is the topic of the text above? A.Survival B.Youth C.Long life span D.Old age E.Health secrets

5

2

Jawaban terverifikasi

Winafajria W

27 Januari 2022 03:33

Generally, by people’s own accounts, the public idea of women at home is that they are dull and boring. The stereotype of a working woman is of hard, ambitious, selfish creatures. It is not just that you are either gen, and dull or selfish and interesting. It is that you are either a good mother or you are an interesting woman. ‘Young women now seem to get a very clear picture that they have got a choice. If they are going, to mothering well, they have got to pay for it by not being interesting women. If you are an interesting working woman, you are a bad mother.’ Lyn Richards puts the blame for such notions and for resulting family tensions the failure of people to talk enough about them. The media, too, are guilty. ‘There is a lot of media coverage successful career women and still a lot, especially in women’s magazines, on the joys of motherhood. There’s no that much about the trouble of either role and precious little about combining the roles. Yet half the women who a married in our society are working. Nor is much thought given to the task of loosening the ties entrapping men. Lyn Richards, a working mother grateful for the privilege of genuinely choosing and being able to afford the role, criticizes the systematic exclusive of men from ‘child rearing and the really pretty fabulous aspects of having children’. She condemns as ludicrous the idea of the 9 to 5 treadmill of work as an absolute duty for men. ‘The sheer irony to me is that the women movement has told women the way to be liberated is to get into the 9 to 5 tied work force that men have be fighting against for a century. Really we should be using changes in women’s values to shake up all the oppression and rigidity that men have been under. Indeed, there has been a change. ‘The new thing since I married is that it’s normal for both husband and wife to go on working when they marry. Now marriage isn’t a particularly big deal. Very often it just legalizes something which has been going on anyway and it certainly doesn’t change a women’s whole basis of life, hermotion of yin she is. The real life change is raving the first child and when that happens I think that probably most couples at still reverting to something like the traditional concept of marriage. But the longer people put off having a child more likely it is that they won’t because they have set up a viable life style. They don’t need to have kids now to have a good marriage. Not that motherhood and raising families are wholly going out of fashion but rather that people are having smaller families. Consequently, the period in a woman’s life when she is not required to devote herself to mothering is lengthening. ‘Motherhood - the mother role - just isn’t a very good identity base today,’ Lyn Richards says ‘Motherhood is a short-terns appointment now. It doesn’t last long. If Lyn is correct, in the future women in families of younger generations .... (A) have less children to care for (B) make up career individuals (C) will be more prosperous (D) are more individualistic (E) share an equal responsibility

2

4

Jawaban terverifikasi

Septiangga S

27 Januari 2022 03:33

Generally, by people’s own accounts, the public idea of women at home is that they are dull and boring. The stereotype of a working woman is of hard, ambitious, selfish creatures. It is not just that you are either gen, and dull or selfish and interesting. It is that you are either a good mother or you are an interesting woman. ‘Young women now seem to get a very clear picture that they have got a choice. If they are going, to mothering well, they have got to pay for it by not being interesting women. If you are an interesting working woman, you are a bad mother.’ Lyn Richards puts the blame for such notions and for resulting family tensions the failure of people to talk enough about them. The media, too, are guilty. ‘There is a lot of media coverage successful career women and still a lot, especially in women’s magazines, on the joys of motherhood. There’s no that much about the trouble of either role and precious little about combining the roles. Yet half the women who a married in our society are working. Nor is much thought given to the task of loosening the ties entrapping men. Lyn Richards, a working mother grateful for the privilege of genuinely choosing and being able to afford the role, criticizes the systematic exclusive of men from ‘child rearing and the really pretty fabulous aspects of having children’. She condemns as ludicrous the idea of the 9 to 5 treadmill of work as an absolute duty for men. ‘The sheer irony to me is that the women movement has told women the way to be liberated is to get into the 9 to 5 tied work force that men have be fighting against for a century. Really we should be using changes in women’s values to shake up all the oppression and rigidity that men have been under. Indeed, there has been a change. ‘The new thing since I married is that it’s normal for both husband and wife to go on working when they marry. Now marriage isn’t a particularly big deal. Very often it just legalizes something which has been going on anyway and it certainly doesn’t change a women’s whole basis of life, hermotion of yin she is. The real life change is raving the first child and when that happens I think that probably most couples at still reverting to something like the traditional concept of marriage. But the longer people put off having a child more likely it is that they won’t because they have set up a viable life style. They don’t need to have kids now to have a good marriage. Not that motherhood and raising families are wholly going out of fashion but rather that people are having smaller families. Consequently, the period in a woman’s life when she is not required to devote herself to mothering is lengthening. ‘Motherhood - the mother role - just isn’t a very good identity base today,’ Lyn Richards says ‘Motherhood is a short-terns appointment now. It doesn’t last long. Lyn argues that in rearing children in a family .... (A) women’s role should be more dominant (B) both men and women are equally responsible (C) men’s role should be put into account (D) working women share equal work distribution (E) men’s role should be excluded.

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Tamiwin T

27 Januari 2022 03:33

Generally, by people’s own accounts, the public idea of women at home is that they are dull and boring. The stereotype of a working woman is of hard, ambitious, selfish creatures. It is not just that you are either gen, and dull or selfish and interesting. It is that you are either a good mother or you are an interesting woman. ‘Young women now seem to get a very clear picture that they have got a choice. If they are going, to mothering well, they have got to pay for it by not being interesting women. If you are an interesting working woman, you are a bad mother.’ Lyn Richards puts the blame for such notions and for resulting family tensions the failure of people to talk enough about them. The media, too, are guilty. ‘There is a lot of media coverage successful career women and still a lot, especially in women’s magazines, on the joys of motherhood. There’s no that much about the trouble of either role and precious little about combining the roles. Yet half the women who a married in our society are working. Nor is much thought given to the task of loosening the ties entrapping men. Lyn Richards, a working mother grateful for the privilege of genuinely choosing and being able to afford the role, criticizes the systematic exclusive of men from ‘child rearing and the really pretty fabulous aspects of having children’. She condemns as ludicrous the idea of the 9 to 5 treadmill of work as an absolute duty for men. ‘The sheer irony to me is that the women movement has told women the way to be liberated is to get into the 9 to 5 tied work force that men have be fighting against for a century. Really we should be using changes in women’s values to shake up all the oppression and rigidity that men have been under. Indeed, there has been a change. ‘The new thing since I married is that it’s normal for both husband and wife to go on working when they marry. Now marriage isn’t a particularly big deal. Very often it just legalizes something which has been going on anyway and it certainly doesn’t change a women’s whole basis of life, hermotion of yin she is. The real life change is raving the first child and when that happens I think that probably most couples at still reverting to something like the traditional concept of marriage. But the longer people put off having a child more likely it is that they won’t because they have set up a viable life style. They don’t need to have kids now to have a good marriage. Not that motherhood and raising families are wholly going out of fashion but rather that people are having smaller families. Consequently, the period in a woman’s life when she is not required to devote herself to mothering is lengthening. ‘Motherhood - the mother role - just isn’t a very good identity base today,’ Lyn Richards says ‘Motherhood is a short-terns appointment now. It doesn’t last long. A relevant question that can be raised out of the passage would be .... (A) What characterizes a good working woman? (B) How could men and women build eternal marriage? (C) What ways are there to keep a family harmonious? (D) Why would the role of a woman in mothering not last long? (E) What requirements should working women fulfill?

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Nafis N

27 Januari 2022 03:32

Generally, by people’s own accounts, the public idea of women at home is that they are dull and boring. The stereotype of a working woman is of hard, ambitious, selfish creatures. It is not just that you are either gen, and dull or selfish and interesting. It is that you are either a good mother or you are an interesting woman. ‘Young women now seem to get a very clear picture that they have got a choice. If they are going, to mothering well, they have got to pay for it by not being interesting women. If you are an interesting working woman, you are a bad mother.’ Lyn Richards puts the blame for such notions and for resulting family tensions the failure of people to talk enough about them. The media, too, are guilty. ‘There is a lot of media coverage successful career women and still a lot, especially in women’s magazines, on the joys of motherhood. There’s no that much about the trouble of either role and precious little about combining the roles. Yet half the women who a married in our society are working. Nor is much thought given to the task of loosening the ties entrapping men. Lyn Richards, a working mother grateful for the privilege of genuinely choosing and being able to afford the role, criticizes the systematic exclusive of men from ‘child rearing and the really pretty fabulous aspects of having children’. She condemns as ludicrous the idea of the 9 to 5 treadmill of work as an absolute duty for men. ‘The sheer irony to me is that the women movement has told women the way to be liberated is to get into the 9 to 5 tied work force that men have be fighting against for a century. Really we should be using changes in women’s values to shake up all the oppression and rigidity that men have been under. Indeed, there has been a change. ‘The new thing since I married is that it’s normal for both husband and wife to go on working when they marry. Now marriage isn’t a particularly big deal. Very often it just legalizes something which has been going on anyway and it certainly doesn’t change a women’s whole basis of life, hermotion of yin she is. The real life change is raving the first child and when that happens I think that probably most couples at still reverting to something like the traditional concept of marriage. But the longer people put off having a child more likely it is that they won’t because they have set up a viable life style. They don’t need to have kids now to have a good marriage. Not that motherhood and raising families are wholly going out of fashion but rather that people are having smaller families. Consequently, the period in a woman’s life when she is not required to devote herself to mothering is lengthening. ‘Motherhood - the mother role - just isn’t a very good identity base today,’ Lyn Richards says ‘Motherhood is a short-terns appointment now. It doesn’t last long. The passage mainly deals with women’s .... (A) alternative role (B) social function (C) natural interest (D) fundamental duty (E) main responsibility

4

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Winafajria W

27 Januari 2022 03:32

Generally, by people’s own accounts, the public idea of women at home is that they are dull and boring. The stereotype of a working woman is of hard, ambitious, selfish creatures. It is not just that you are either gen, and dull or selfish and interesting. It is that you are either a good mother or you are an interesting woman. ‘Young women now seem to get a very clear picture that they have got a choice. If they are going, to mothering well, they have got to pay for it by not being interesting women. If you are an interesting working woman, you are a bad mother.’ Lyn Richards puts the blame for such notions and for resulting family tensions the failure of people to talk enough about them. The media, too, are guilty. ‘There is a lot of media coverage successful career women and still a lot, especially in women’s magazines, on the joys of motherhood. There’s no that much about the trouble of either role and precious little about combining the roles. Yet half the women who a married in our society are working. Nor is much thought given to the task of loosening the ties entrapping men. Lyn Richards, a working mother grateful for the privilege of genuinely choosing and being able to afford the role, criticizes the systematic exclusive of men from ‘child rearing and the really pretty fabulous aspects of having children’. She condemns as ludicrous the idea of the 9 to 5 treadmill of work as an absolute duty for men. ‘The sheer irony to me is that the women movement has told women the way to be liberated is to get into the 9 to 5 tied work force that men have be fighting against for a century. Really we should be using changes in women’s values to shake up all the oppression and rigidity that men have been under. Indeed, there has been a change. ‘The new thing since I married is that it’s normal for both husband and wife to go on working when they marry. Now marriage isn’t a particularly big deal. Very often it just legalizes something which has been going on anyway and it certainly doesn’t change a women’s whole basis of life, hermotion of yin she is. The real life change is raving the first child and when that happens I think that probably most couples at still reverting to something like the traditional concept of marriage. But the longer people put off having a child more likely it is that they won’t because they have set up a viable life style. They don’t need to have kids now to have a good marriage. Not that motherhood and raising families are wholly going out of fashion but rather that people are having smaller families. Consequently, the period in a woman’s life when she is not required to devote herself to mothering is lengthening. ‘Motherhood - the mother role - just isn’t a very good identity base today,’ Lyn Richards says ‘Motherhood is a short-terns appointment now. It doesn’t last long. The expression combining the roles in ‘... precious little about combining the roles.’ (paragraph 2) in the passage means .... (A) being either a married or a career woman (B) working both in an office and at home (C) serving the family and doing office work (D) enjoying motherhood and caring for the family (E) having a dual role of mother and career woman

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Okedia O

27 Januari 2022 02:51

Gastronomy is the study of the relationship between culture and food. It is often thought 1. ____ that the term gastronomy refers exclusively to the art of cooking (see Culinary Arts), but this is only a small part of this discipline: it cannot always be said that a cook is also a gourmet. Gastronomy studies various 2. ____ components with food as its central axis. Thus it is related to the Fine Arts and Social Sciences, and even to the Natural Sciences in terms of the digestive system of the human body. A gourmet’s principal activities involve discovering, tasting, experiencing, researching, understanding and writing about foods. Gastronomy is, 3. ____ an inter-disciplinary activity. Good observation will 4. ____ that around the food, there exists dance, dramatic arts, painting, sculpture, literature, architecture, and music; in other words, the Fine Arts. 5. ____ it also involves physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology, geology, agronomy, and also anthropology, history, philosophy, psychology, and sociology. The application of scientific knowledge to cooking and gastronomy has become known as molecular gastronomy. 5. (A) However (B) Consequently (C) Hence (D) Thus (E) Therefor

1

1

Jawaban terverifikasi
1103104105
Ruangguru

RUANGGURU HQ

Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru

Download di Google Play

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru

Download di Google PlayDownload di AppstoreDownload di App Gallery

Produk Ruangguru

Produk Lainnya

Bantuan & Panduan

Hubungi Kami

Ruangguru WhatsApp

+62 815-7441-0000

Email info@ruangguru.com

[email protected]

Contact 02130930000

02130930000

Ikuti Kami

©2026 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia