Iklan

Iklan

Pertanyaan

Forget what world leaders say. If you want to understand what they are really up to, look at the paintings that hang behind them at press conferences and summit meetings, or when they pause with apparent spontaneity along a corridor to answer a reporter's question. The silent stare of a poised portrait gazing at you over the shoulder of David Cameron or Vladimir Putin is often more loaded and more deliberately orchestrated than you might think. For example, President Obama's recent trip to Cuba in March 2016 was considered his boldest step. His controversial agenda was to reset diplomatic relations between the two nations. However, it was a painting by a Cuban artist that (1) stole the show. Among the more awkward events on Obama's Cuban itinerary was a meeting with a group of (2) political dissidents, many of (3)___ fear the thawing of relations between Washington and Havana will only embolden the repressive tendencies of Cuban president Raul Castro by legitimising his regime. Enter Michel Mirabal, a contemporary Cuban artist whose sprawling painting My New Friend provided the striking backdrop to the meeting. The work stretched evocatively behind Obama as he sat at a long table to discuss the concerns of the Cuban government's detractors. It features side-by-side representations of the Cuban and US flags constructed loosely of red, white, and blue handprints pressed against (4)___. As a subliminal symbol capable of capturing, on the one hand the plight of those oppressed by the Cuban government, and on the other hand, Obama's commitment to ending sanctions against Cuba, the painting (5)____. The hasty blizzard of anonymous handprints has the feel of street art or something illicitly constructed: a compression of innocence that recalls the clay moulds made by children in kindergarten. At the same time, the two flags appear to be visual anagrams of each other. Each consists of the same handprints merely arranged in different combinations, as if subtly to imply that the two countries are essentially inseparable. (3) ….. (SIMAK UI 2016)

     Forget what world leaders say. If you want to understand what they are really up to, look at the paintings that hang behind them at press conferences and summit meetings, or when they pause with apparent spontaneity along a corridor to answer a reporter's question. The silent stare of a poised portrait gazing at you over the shoulder of David Cameron or Vladimir Putin is often more loaded and more deliberately orchestrated than you might think.

     For example, President Obama's recent trip to Cuba in March 2016 was considered his boldest step. His controversial agenda was to reset diplomatic relations between the two nations. However, it was a painting by a Cuban artist that (1) stole the show. Among the more awkward events on Obama's Cuban itinerary was a meeting with a group of (2) political dissidents, many of (3)___ fear the thawing of relations between Washington and Havana will only embolden the repressive tendencies of Cuban president Raul Castro by legitimising his regime. Enter Michel Mirabal, a contemporary Cuban artist whose sprawling painting My New Friend provided the striking backdrop to the meeting.

     The work stretched evocatively behind Obama as he sat at a long table to discuss the concerns of the Cuban government's detractors. It features side-by-side representations of the Cuban and US flags constructed loosely of red, white, and blue handprints pressed against (4)___. As a subliminal symbol capable of capturing, on the one hand the plight of those oppressed by the Cuban government, and on the other hand, Obama's commitment to ending sanctions against Cuba, the painting (5)____. The hasty blizzard of anonymous handprints has the feel of street art or something illicitly constructed: a compression of innocence that recalls the clay moulds made by children in kindergarten. At the same time, the two flags appear to be visual anagrams of each other. Each consists of the same handprints merely arranged in different combinations, as if subtly to imply that the two countries are essentially inseparable.

 

(3) ….. (SIMAK UI 2016) undefined 

  1. whose undefined 

  2. which undefined 

  3. whom undefined 

  4. who undefined 

  5. those undefined 

Iklan

A. Kencana

Master Teacher

Jawaban terverifikasi

Iklan

Pembahasan

Who, whom, whose dan which merupakan relative prounoun dengan arti yangsama yaitu "yang". Relative pronoun adalah kata penghubungyang berfungsi untuk menjelaskan lebih detail suatu hal. Who, whom dan whose digunakan untuk menjelaskan orang, sedangkan which untuk menjelaskan benda. Sementara itu, those adalah determiner untuk merujuk kepada orang dan benda yang jumlahnya lebih dari 1 dan terletak jauh dari pembicara. Those artinya "itu". " ...a group ofpolitical dissidents, many of ____fear. .. " artinya "sekelompok pembangkang politik, banyak diantara ____ takut ...". Kata yang tepat untuk melengkapi bagian rumpang adalah " yang ". Oleh karena itu pilihan D tidak tepat. Pembangkang pastilah manusia, bukan benda. Dengan demikian, B tidak tepat. Pilihan yang tersisa adalah who, whom dan whose . Who digunakan untuk menjelaskan subjek dan selalu diikuti oleh verb. Whom digunakan untuk menjelaskan objek dan selalu diikuti subject atau selalu diikuti preposition . Whose digunakan untuk menjelaskan kepemilikan sehingga selalu diikuti noun. " of " merupakan preposisi. Dengan demikian, relative pronoun yang tepat untuk melengkapi bagian rumpang adalah whom. Jadi, jawbaan yang tepat adalah C.

Who, whom, whose dan which merupakan relative prounoun dengan arti yang sama yaitu "yang". Relative pronoun adalah kata penghubung yang berfungsi untuk menjelaskan lebih detail suatu hal. Who, whom dan whose digunakan untuk menjelaskan orang, sedangkan which untuk menjelaskan benda. Sementara itu, those adalah determiner untuk merujuk kepada orang dan benda yang jumlahnya lebih dari 1 dan terletak jauh dari pembicara. Those artinya "itu".

"... a group of political dissidents, many of  ____ fear... " artinya "sekelompok pembangkang politik, banyak diantara ____ takut ...".

Kata yang tepat untuk melengkapi bagian rumpang adalah "yang". Oleh karena itu pilihan D tidak tepat.

Pembangkang pastilah manusia, bukan benda. Dengan demikian, B tidak tepat. 

Pilihan yang tersisa adalah who, whom dan whose

  • Who digunakan untuk menjelaskan subjek dan selalu diikuti oleh verb.
  • Whom digunakan untuk menjelaskan objek dan selalu diikuti subject atau selalu diikuti preposition.
  • Whose digunakan untuk menjelaskan kepemilikan sehingga selalu diikuti noun.

"of" merupakan preposisi. Dengan demikian, relative pronoun yang tepat untuk melengkapi bagian rumpang adalah whom.

Jadi, jawbaan yang tepat adalah C. undefined 

 

 

Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!

26

Iklan

Iklan

Pertanyaan serupa

Forget what world leaders say. If you want to understand what they are really up to, look at the paintings that hang behind them at press conferences and summit meetings, or when they pause with appar...

47

3.0

Jawaban terverifikasi

RUANGGURU HQ

Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru

Download di Google PlayDownload di AppstoreDownload di App Gallery

Produk Ruangguru

Hubungi Kami

Ruangguru WhatsApp

+62 815-7441-0000

Email info@ruangguru.com

[email protected]

Contact 02140008000

02140008000

Ikuti Kami

©2024 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia