Iklan

Pertanyaan

The question is based on the following question. There are numerous consequences due to illegal logging and illegal activities in the forestry sector. Revenues lost by governments caused by illegal logging results in a decrease of their ability to invest in the forestry sector. This has an effect on poverty levels, primarily because of the revenue lost by the government. As a result, this reduces their financial capability as well as the programs that could be implemented to help the poor. Moreover, poor people are not in a position to influence political bodies. This keeps them from accessing the forest resource. Finally, the resource’s low cost contributes to an increase in waste and provides very little incentive to buy timber harvested from forests managed in a sustainable manner. Inadequate forest law enforcement and governance in other countries can also threaten sustainable forest management. As for the direct negative consequences of illegal logging on the wood products industry, their effect is to simultaneously increase harvesting and increase the availability of timber, thus lowering the price for producers. The price decrease suffered by producers can lead to unfair competition, thus reducing the profitability of legal companies. Illegal logging is disincentive to sustainable forest management. The illegal timber trade threatens not only the viability of legal trade, but also its reputation. Despite the negative impacts, some stakeholders might benefit from illegal forest activities, such as consumers who could benefit from lower prices and national industries that could increase their competitiveness by having access to lower timber prices. Several initiatives have emerged to combat illegal logging and illegal activities in the forestry sector. Among them, it is important to mention the policy statements issued by wood producers’ associations, government initiatives which range from procurement policies to the signature of memoranda of understanding between countries, and the procurement policies of major do-it-yourself centres. Other more practical solutions are being put forward to reduce illegal logging and trade. Some of those solutions relate more to timber trade. There is no doubt that forest certification is seen, for some, as a tool among many others that enables control over the illegal wood trade. They include log tracking systems, legality license-based verification systems such as labelling, private and public procurement policies, international cooperation and coordination on trade statistics, information exchange on illegal logging and illegal trade, and the study of possible trade-related measures. The paragraph following the passage will most likely discuss .…

The question is based on the following question.
 

    There are numerous consequences due to illegal logging and illegal activities in the forestry sector. Revenues lost by governments caused by illegal logging results in a decrease of their ability to invest in the forestry sector. This has an effect on poverty levels, primarily because of the revenue lost by the government. As a result, this reduces their financial capability as well as the programs that could be implemented to help the poor.

    Moreover, poor people are not in a position to influence political bodies. This keeps them from accessing the forest resource. Finally, the resource’s low cost contributes to an increase in waste and provides very little incentive to buy timber harvested from forests managed in a sustainable manner. Inadequate forest law enforcement and governance in other countries can also threaten sustainable forest management.

    As for the direct negative consequences of illegal logging on the wood products industry, their effect is to simultaneously increase harvesting and increase the availability of timber, thus lowering the price for producers. The price decrease suffered by producers can lead to unfair competition, thus reducing the profitability of legal companies. Illegal logging is disincentive to sustainable forest management. The illegal timber trade threatens not only the viability of legal trade, but also its reputation.

    Despite the negative impacts, some stakeholders might benefit from illegal forest activities, such as consumers who could benefit from lower prices and national industries that could increase their competitiveness by having access to lower timber prices.

    Several initiatives have emerged to combat illegal logging and illegal activities in the forestry sector. Among them, it is important to mention the policy statements issued by wood producers’ associations, government initiatives which range from procurement policies to the signature of memoranda of understanding between countries, and the procurement policies of major do-it-yourself centres.

    Other more practical solutions are being put forward to reduce illegal logging and trade. Some of those solutions relate more to timber trade. There is no doubt that forest certification is seen, for some, as a tool among many others that enables control over the illegal wood trade. They include log tracking systems, legality license-based verification systems such as labelling, private and public procurement policies, international cooperation and coordination on trade statistics, information exchange on illegal logging and illegal trade, and the study of possible trade-related measures.


The paragraph following the passage will most likely discuss .… space space

  1. solution details about timber trade-related methods undefined  undefined

  2. log certification processes for international markets undefined  undefined

  3. parties involved in studies on trade-related measures undefined  undefined

  4. examples of cases on methods in combating illegal logging undefined  undefined

  5. explanations on log tracking and license verification systems undefined  undefined

Ikuti Tryout SNBT & Menangkan E-Wallet 100rb

Habis dalam

00

:

07

:

55

:

25

Klaim

Iklan

A. Kencana

Master Teacher

Jawaban terverifikasi

Jawaban

jawaban yang tepat adalah A.

jawaban yang tepat adalah A.space space

Pembahasan

Soal menanyakan topik yang kemungkinan dibahas pada paragraf yang mengikuti teks tersebut. Untuk menjawab soal seperti ini, cukup fokus ke paragraf terakhir. Dalam paragraf terakhir disebutkan solusiuntuk mengatasi perdagangan kayu ilegal seperti forest certification dan log tracking systems. Namun, penjelasan lebih detail dari solusi-solusi tersebut belum ada, maka paragraf selanjutnya kemungkinan akan membahas hal tersebut. Pilihan B (proses sertifikasi kayu untuk pasar internasional) tidak tepat. Hal ini tidak dibahas sama sekali pada paragraf terakhir. Paragraf terakhir membahas forest certification , bukan log certification . Pilihan C (pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam penelitian mengenai tindakan perdagangan) tidak tepat karena gagasannya terlalu luas. Perdagangan pada kalimat tersebut merujuk kepada perdagangan secara umum, sedangkan paragraf terakhir membahas perdagangan kayu. Pilihan D (contoh kasus metode pemberantasan illegal logging ) tidak tepat . Paragraf terakhir membahas tentang solusi illegal logging dari segi perdagangannya, bukan dari segi pembalakan liarnya. Jadi, teksnya tidak akan koheren jika paragraf berikutnya membahas tentang contoh kasus pemberantasan illegal logging . Pilihan E (penjelasan tentang sistem pelacakan kayu dan verifikasi lisensi) tidak tepat karena penjelasannya sudah ada di paragraf terakhir. Dengan demikian, jawaban yang tepat adalah A.

Soal menanyakan topik yang kemungkinan dibahas pada paragraf yang mengikuti teks tersebut. Untuk menjawab soal seperti ini, cukup fokus ke paragraf terakhir.

Dalam paragraf terakhir disebutkan solusi untuk mengatasi perdagangan kayu ilegal seperti forest certification dan log tracking systems. Namun, penjelasan lebih detail dari solusi-solusi tersebut belum ada, maka paragraf selanjutnya kemungkinan akan membahas hal tersebut. 

Pilihan B (proses sertifikasi kayu untuk pasar internasional) tidak tepat. Hal ini tidak dibahas sama sekali pada paragraf terakhir. Paragraf terakhir membahas forest certification, bukan log certification.

Pilihan C (pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam penelitian mengenai tindakan perdagangan) tidak tepat karena gagasannya terlalu luas. Perdagangan pada kalimat tersebut merujuk kepada perdagangan secara umum, sedangkan paragraf terakhir membahas perdagangan kayu.

Pilihan D (contoh kasus metode pemberantasan illegal logging) tidak tepat. Paragraf terakhir membahas tentang solusi illegal logging dari segi perdagangannya, bukan dari segi pembalakan liarnya. Jadi, teksnya tidak akan koheren jika paragraf berikutnya membahas tentang contoh kasus pemberantasan illegal logging.

Pilihan E (penjelasan tentang sistem pelacakan kayu dan verifikasi lisensi) tidak tepat karena penjelasannya sudah ada di paragraf terakhir. 

Dengan demikian, jawaban yang tepat adalah A.space space

Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!

5

Iklan

Pertanyaan serupa

The question is based on the following passage. In addition to inactive lifestyle and unsupportive environment, genes and family history also contribute to overweight and obesity cases. Studies o...

8

0.0

Jawaban terverifikasi

RUANGGURU HQ

Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru

Download di Google PlayDownload di AppstoreDownload di App Gallery

Produk Ruangguru

Hubungi Kami

Ruangguru WhatsApp

+62 815-7441-0000

Email info@ruangguru.com

[email protected]

Contact 02140008000

02140008000

Ikuti Kami

©2024 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia