Question number 64-66 are based on the following passage.
 

    If you noticed headlines recently suggesting smoking could protect against COVID-19, you might have been surprised. After all, we know smoking is bad for our health. It's a leading risk factor for heart disease, lung disease and many cancers. Smoking also reduces our immunity, and makes us more susceptible to respiratory infections including pneumonia. And smokers touch their mouth and face more, a risk for COVID-19 patients, as the World Health Organization and other bodies have identified. But a recent paper which examined smoking rates among COVID-19 patients in a French hospital hypothesized smoking might make people less susceptible to COVID-19 infection. So what can we make of this?

    This study was a cross-sectional survey where the researchers assessed the exposure (smoking) and the outcome (COVID-19) at the same time. This type of research design can't prove the exposure causes the outcome only that there may be an association. There were two groups included in the study - 343 in patients treated for COVID-19 from February 28 to March 30, and 139 outpatients treated from March 23 to April 9. Among other data collected, participants were asked whether they were current smokers. The researchers compared smoking rates in both groups with smoking rates in the general French population.

    The study found 4,4 percent of inpatients and 5.3 percent of outpatients with COVID-19 were smokers, after adjusting for differences in age and sex. This was only a fraction of the prevalence seen in the general French population. Some 25,4 percent reportedly smoked daily in 2018. The authors asserted: current smokers have a very much lower probability of developing symptomatic or severe SARS-CoV-2 infection as compared to the mechanism behind the protective effects of smoking could be found in nicotine. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, gains entry into human cells by latching onto protein receptors called ACE2, which are found on certain cells' surfaces. The researchers have proposed nicotine attaches to the ACE2 receptors, thereby preventing the virus from attaching and potentially reducing the amount of virus that can get into a person's lung cells. The researchers are now planning to test their hypothesis in a randomized trial involving nicotine patches; thought the trial is still awaiting approval from French health authorities.

    These counterintuitive results may be less likely to be daily smokers than the general population. For example, health-care workers and those with existing chronic conditions were disproportionately represented in the inpatient sample-both of these group usually show lower prevalence of current smoking. Further, around 60 percent of the hospitalized patients in the study were ex-smokers (similar to the national prevalence). Some may have given up smoking very recently in response to the WHO declaring smoking as a risk factor for COVID-19. But they were classified as non-daily smokers in the study. Second is what we call "social desirability bias". COVI D-19 patients may be more likely to deny smoking when asked about their smoking status in hospital, wanting to be seen by medical professionals as doing the right thing. And data collection may have been incomplete for behavioral questions in busy hospital overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases. Final y, it's important to note this paper has not yet
been peer-reviewed. Taken together, although there appears to be an association between smoking and COVID-19 in these hospital based samples, there's no evidence of a causal relationship - that is, that smoking prevents COVI D-19.

    We must acknowledge this research has been conducted at "pandemic speed", much faster usual research time frames. Normally it would be months between submission and publication - but in this case the researchers completed their observations and had the research published online within the same month. An unintended consequence of the early release of research is that it may provoke undue community hope or belief in unproven treatments. We saw a similar phenomenon recently with the d ug hydroxychloroquine, where supplies ran out for those who needed them after politicians proclaimed it as a cure for COVID-19. So right now we need to put in extra effort to make sure early evidence is not misinterpreted or overstated. As for the role of smoking in COVID-19-this link requires substantially more research and critical appraisal. Because overall, smoking still kills.

As for the role of smoking in COVID-19 this link requires substantially more research and critical appraisal. Because overall, smoking still kills. What is the author's bias about the statement?