Iklan
Pertanyaan
The text is for the following question. It is widely believed that there are only two options for patients with terminal illness, either they die suffering or receive euthanasia. A number of people, especially in western part of the world, agrees with the idea of doing euthanasia or good death they call it. Euthanasia is generally defined as the act, undertaken only by a physician, that intentionally ends the life of a person at his or her request. This act has been legalized in a small number of countries of the world. However, is euthanasia the best choice for people suffering from terminal illness? I personally believe that life is the ultimate gift from God, and taking it away is usurping power that belongs to God only. Religion, Catholic and Islam for example, sees euthanasia as a type of murder, a crime, and an immoral act. In Hinduism, they think that even though helping a person enda painful live may be good, it interferes with the cycle of death and rebirth. Also, euthanasia is bad because of the sanctity of human life. We should never kill human beings as they are to be valued. Many people think that we have value when we make other people’s life better. Thus, when we’re terminally ill, and we become a burden to our family, we would better do euthanasia. That way we make their lives easier and better. However, our inherent value doesn't depend on anything else. It doesn't depend on whether we are having a good life, or whether we are making other people's lives better. We exist, so we have value. Thus, we shouldn't treat other people as a means to our own ends. It applies to us too. We shouldn't treat ourselves as a means to our own ends. Furthermore, this means that we shouldn't end our lives just because it seems the most effective way of putting an end to our suffering or to ease people’s lives. Doing that is not to respect our inherent worth. The last, proponents of euthanasia argue that all human being has the right to choose whether to continue living or end their life for good reasons. However, euthanasia is not about the right to die. They are about the right to kill. Legalising euthanasia would only put too much power in the hands of doctors, who could abuse their position. They may soon start killing people without bothering with their permission. In conclusion, I value the opportunity of living in a free society. People indeed have personal autonomy, but I value life more, and I also recognise that personal autonomy has its limits. When we make a decision to end our or other people’s life, we have to remember that many other people, such as family and friends, who are left behind, will also be affected. Our sacred life belongs to God, the only one who can take it from us. From the text, we know that ...
The text is for the following question.
It is widely believed that there are only two options for patients with terminal illness, either they die suffering or receive euthanasia. A number of people, especially in western part of the world, agrees with the idea of doing euthanasia or good death they call it. Euthanasia is generally defined as the act, undertaken only by a physician, that intentionally ends the life of a person at his or her request. This act has been legalized in a small number of countries of the world. However, is euthanasia the best choice for people suffering from terminal illness?
I personally believe that life is the ultimate gift from God, and taking it away is usurping power that belongs to God only. Religion, Catholic and Islam for example, sees euthanasia as a type of murder, a crime, and an immoral act. In Hinduism, they think that even though helping a person end a painful live may be good, it interferes with the cycle of death and rebirth.
Also, euthanasia is bad because of the sanctity of human life. We should never kill human beings as they are to be valued. Many people think that we have value when we make other people’s life better. Thus, when we’re terminally ill, and we become a burden to our family, we would better do euthanasia. That way we make their lives easier and better. However, our inherent value doesn't depend on anything else. It doesn't depend on whether we are having a good life, or whether we are making other people's lives better. We exist, so we have value. Thus, we shouldn't treat other people as a means to our own ends. It applies to us too. We shouldn't treat ourselves as a means to our own ends. Furthermore, this means that we shouldn't end our lives just because it seems the most effective way of putting an end to our suffering or to ease people’s lives. Doing that is not to respect our inherent worth.
The last, proponents of euthanasia argue that all human being has the right to choose whether to continue living or end their life for good reasons. However, euthanasia is not about the right to die. They are about the right to kill. Legalising euthanasia would only put too much power in the hands of doctors, who could abuse their position. They may soon start killing people without bothering with their permission.
In conclusion, I value the opportunity of living in a free society. People indeed have personal autonomy, but I value life more, and I also recognise that personal autonomy has its limits. When we make a decision to end our or other people’s life, we have to remember that many other people, such as family and friends, who are left behind, will also be affected. Our sacred life belongs to God, the only one who can take it from us.
From the text, we know that ...
Religion is against euthanasia for any reason.
Euthanasia is a must for terminally ill patients.
People are believed to have limitless autonomy.
Legalising euthanasia requires approval from religious groups.
Most people agree with the idea of euthanasia legalisation.
Iklan
A. Lee
Master Teacher
Jawaban
pilihan jawaban yang tepat adalah A.
Pembahasan
Pada paragraf kedua kalimat kedua dijelaskan bahwa agama, misalnya Katolik dan Islam, memandang eutanasia sebagai pembunuhan dantindakan kriminal sehingga dianggap tidak bermoral. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa agama menentang eutanasia untuk alasan apapun . Dengan demikian, pernyataan A tepat , sedangkan pernyataan D tidak tepat karena sudah pasti agama tidak akan mengizinkan legalisasi eutanasia. Lagipula, tidak ada informasi dalam teks yang membahas tentang pihak-pihak yang dimintai izin untuk legalisasi eutanasia. Pada paragraf pertama kalimat pertama dijelaskan "Secara luas diyakini bahwa hanya ada dua pilihan bagi pasien yang menderita penyakit parah, yaitu meninggal dalam keadaan sekarat atau menerima eutanasia.". Jadi, eutanasia itu adalah pilihan, bukan keharusan . Dengan demikian, pernyataan B tidak tepat . Pada paragraf terakhir dijelaskan " I also recognise that personal autonomy has its limits." yang artinya "saya mengetahui bahwa hak pribadi itu ada batasnya .". Jadi, pernyataan C tidak tepat . Pada paragraf pertama kalimat kedua dijelaskan bahwa sejumlah orang, terutama negara-negara barat, setuju dengan gagasan legalisasi eutanasia. Sejumlah tidak sama artinya dengan kebanyakan ( most ) . Oleh karena itu, pernyataan E tidak tepat . Dengan demikian, pilihan jawaban yang tepat adalah A.
Pada paragraf kedua kalimat kedua dijelaskan bahwa agama, misalnya Katolik dan Islam, memandang eutanasia sebagai pembunuhan dan tindakan kriminal sehingga dianggap tidak bermoral. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa agama menentang eutanasia untuk alasan apapun. Dengan demikian, pernyataan A tepat, sedangkan pernyataan D tidak tepat karena sudah pasti agama tidak akan mengizinkan legalisasi eutanasia. Lagipula, tidak ada informasi dalam teks yang membahas tentang pihak-pihak yang dimintai izin untuk legalisasi eutanasia.
Pada paragraf pertama kalimat pertama dijelaskan "Secara luas diyakini bahwa hanya ada dua pilihan bagi pasien yang menderita penyakit parah, yaitu meninggal dalam keadaan sekarat atau menerima eutanasia.". Jadi, eutanasia itu adalah pilihan, bukan keharusan. Dengan demikian, pernyataan B tidak tepat.
Pada paragraf terakhir dijelaskan "I also recognise that personal autonomy has its limits." yang artinya "saya mengetahui bahwa hak pribadi itu ada batasnya.". Jadi, pernyataan C tidak tepat.
Pada paragraf pertama kalimat kedua dijelaskan bahwa sejumlah orang, terutama negara-negara barat, setuju dengan gagasan legalisasi eutanasia. Sejumlah tidak sama artinya dengan kebanyakan (most). Oleh karena itu, pernyataan E tidak tepat.
Dengan demikian, pilihan jawaban yang tepat adalah A.
Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!
3
0.0 (0 rating)
Iklan
RUANGGURU HQ
Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860
Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru
Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru
Produk Ruangguru
Bantuan & Panduan
Hubungi Kami
Ikuti Kami
©2024 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia