Iklan
Pertanyaan
Some people were executed in Indonesia through July 2016. Most death penalty cases involve the execution of drug peddlers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes. Many for and against reactions came after the execution. Then, should the death penalty be allowed in Indonesia? Proponents of the death penalty say that it is an important tool for law enforcement, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They also argue that retribution or "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause future tragedy. Opponents of capital punishment say that it has no deterrent effect on crime, gives governments’ overlapped power to take human life, and potentially makes social injustices by disproportionately targeting people of color (racist) and people who cannot afford good attorneys (classist). They say lifetime jail sentences are a more appropriate than death. In conclusion, death penalty will always exist in our society as well as its pros and cons. For the proponents of this action, they think that it will be very effective to deter crime. While for those who are against this policy, they argue that this punishment will potentially make social injustice. Why did the opponents of the death penalty withstand the penalty in Indonesia?
Some people were executed in Indonesia through July 2016. Most death penalty cases involve the execution of drug peddlers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes. Many for and against reactions came after the execution. Then, should the death penalty be allowed in Indonesia?
Proponents of the death penalty say that it is an important tool for law enforcement, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They also argue that retribution or "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause future tragedy.
Opponents of capital punishment say that it has no deterrent effect on crime, gives governments’ overlapped power to take human life, and potentially makes social injustices by disproportionately targeting people of color (racist) and people who cannot afford good attorneys (classist). They say lifetime jail sentences are a more appropriate than death.
In conclusion, death penalty will always exist in our society as well as its pros and cons. For the proponents of this action, they think that it will be very effective to deter crime. While for those who are against this policy, they argue that this punishment will potentially make social injustice.
Why did the opponents of the death penalty withstand the penalty in Indonesia?
They said that the death penalty gives governments’ overlapped reign to take human life.
They assured that the death penalty potentially makes social equities by disproportionately targeting people of color (racist).
They assured that the death penalty potentially makes social equities by disproportionately targeting people who cannot afford good attorneys (classist).
They believed that lifetime jail sentences are a more inexpedient than death.
They said that the death penalty has no completion effect on crime.
Iklan
N. Supriyaningsih
Master Teacher
Pembahasan
Paragraf tiga pada teks diatas terdapat berbagai alasan dari penentang adanya hukuman mati. Salah satunya adalah hukuman mati tidak memberikan efek jera pelaku kejahatan. Hal ini terdapat pada kalimat pertama di paragraf tiga, “opponents of capital punishment say that it has no deterrent effect on crime ”. Pernyatan pendukung tersebut terdapat pada pilihan jawaban E. They said that the death penalty has no completion effect on crime. Meskipun beberapa katanya diganti, tetapi maknanya tetap relavan. Kata “capital punnishment” merujuk ke “death penalty” dan kata “completion” merujuk ke “deterrent”.
Paragraf tiga pada teks diatas terdapat berbagai alasan dari penentang adanya hukuman mati. Salah satunya adalah hukuman mati tidak memberikan efek jera pelaku kejahatan. Hal ini terdapat pada kalimat pertama di paragraf tiga, “opponents of capital punishment say that it has no deterrent effect on crime”. Pernyatan pendukung tersebut terdapat pada pilihan jawaban E. They said that the death penalty has no completion effect on crime. Meskipun beberapa katanya diganti, tetapi maknanya tetap relavan. Kata “capital punnishment” merujuk ke “death penalty” dan kata “completion” merujuk ke “deterrent”.
Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!
4
5.0 (1 rating)
Iklan
Pertanyaan serupa
RUANGGURU HQ
Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860
Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru
Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru
Produk Ruangguru
Bantuan & Panduan
Hubungi Kami
Ikuti Kami
©2024 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia