Iklan

Pertanyaan

Prime Minister: Honorable panel of educators, time keeper, colleagues, opposition and people of the floor. This house believes that homework should be banned since it has little educational worth and adds nothing to the time spent in school. Before that, I want to give the definition of homework. Homework, simply, is the work that teachers give their students to do at home. Homework produces large amount of pointless work of little educational value, but marking it ties up much of teachers’ time. This leaves teachers tired and with little time to prepare more effective, inspiring lessons. In addition, the children do enough in school. Giving them homework is like putting much pressure on children to grow up quickly. They do not get the time to rest, have fun and be children. That’s why we believe that homework should be banned. Leader of Opposition: It’s not true that homework has little education value. Homework, indeed, is a vital and valuable part of education. There are only a few hours in each school day – not enough time to cover properly all the subjects children need to study. Setting homework extends study beyond school hours, allowing a wider and deeper education. It also makes the best use of teachers, who can spend lesson time teaching rather than just supervising individual work that could be done at home. Tasks such as reading, writing essays, researching, doing maths problems, etc. are best done at home, away from the distractions of other students. As for the marking, teachers accept that marking student work is an important part of their job. Well planned homework should not take so long to mark that the rest of their job suffers, and it can inform their understanding of their students, helping them design new activities to engage and stretch them. And for the children time for playing. If you think the school is giving a lot of homework, that should be changed, and it should be lessened, but not banned. If it’s banned, then what are they going to do all day? Just play with no intellectual mind whatsoever? How will that prepare them for the real world? After all, school is a place of education, and if the homework is given correctly and efficiently, it shouldn’t be a problem. The proposition agrees with the debate’s motion for various reasons, except…

Prime Minister:

Honorable panel of educators, time keeper, colleagues, opposition and people of the floor. This house believes that homework should be banned since it has little educational worth and adds nothing to the time spent in school. Before that, I want to give the definition of homework. Homework, simply, is the work that teachers give their students to do at home.

Homework produces large amount of pointless work of little educational value, but marking it ties up much of teachers’ time. This leaves teachers tired and with little time to prepare more effective, inspiring lessons. In addition, the children do enough in school. Giving them homework is like putting much pressure on children to grow up quickly. They do not get the time to rest, have fun and be children. That’s why we believe that homework should be banned.

Leader of Opposition:

It’s not true that homework has little education value. Homework, indeed, is a vital and valuable part of education. There are only a few hours in each school day – not enough time to cover properly all the subjects children need to study. Setting homework extends study beyond school hours, allowing a wider and deeper education. It also makes the best use of teachers, who can spend lesson time teaching rather than just supervising individual work that could be done at home. Tasks such as reading, writing essays, researching, doing maths problems, etc. are best done at home, away from the distractions of other students.
    
As for the marking, teachers accept that marking student work is an important part of their job. Well planned homework should not take so long to mark that the rest of their job suffers, and it can inform their understanding of their students, helping them design new activities to engage and stretch them.

And for the children time for playing. If you think the school is giving a lot of homework, that should be changed, and it should be lessened, but not banned. If it’s banned, then what are they going to do all day? Just play with no intellectual mind whatsoever? How will that prepare them for the real world? After all, school is a place of education, and if the homework is given correctly and efficiently, it shouldn’t be a problem.

The proposition agrees with the debate’s motion for various reasons, except…

  1. it does little to develop good studying skill

  2. it adds nothing to standardised test scores

  3. it might decrease teachers’ time plan effective and exciting lesson

  4. it allows the students to have more time to spend with family

  5. the students have done enough at school

Ikuti Tryout SNBT & Menangkan E-Wallet 100rb

Habis dalam

02

:

02

:

49

:

04

Klaim

Iklan

N. Supriyaningsih

Master Teacher

Jawaban terverifikasi

Pembahasan

Prime Minister (proposition) percaya bahwa PR seharusnya dihapuskan karena berbagai alasan, yaitu: nilai edukasinya kecil (little educational values), berarti ini mencakup pilihan A dan B. Menilai PR juga menyita waktu guru dan pada akhirnya akan kekurangan waktu untuk merencanakan pembelajaran yang menarik dan efektif (leaves teachers tired and with little time to prepare more effective, inspiring lessons). Anak-anak juga sudah cukup belajar di sekolah. Memberi mereka PR sama seperti memberi mereka beban (the children do enough in school. Giving them homework is like putting much pressure). Berarti pernyataan E benar. Maka yang tidak menjadi alasan proposisi mendukung mosi dalam debat tersebut adalah D.

Prime Minister (proposition) percaya bahwa PR seharusnya dihapuskan karena berbagai alasan, yaitu:  nilai edukasinya kecil (little educational values), berarti ini mencakup pilihan A dan B. Menilai PR juga menyita waktu guru dan pada akhirnya akan kekurangan waktu untuk merencanakan pembelajaran yang menarik dan efektif (leaves teachers tired and with little time to prepare more effective, inspiring lessons). Anak-anak juga sudah cukup belajar di sekolah. Memberi mereka PR sama seperti memberi mereka beban (the children do enough in school. Giving them homework is like putting much pressure). Berarti pernyataan E benar. Maka yang tidak menjadi alasan proposisi mendukung mosi dalam debat tersebut adalah D.
 

 

Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!

1

Iklan

Pertanyaan serupa

The following is the speakers of Australia-Asia Debate consists, except …

1

0.0

Jawaban terverifikasi

RUANGGURU HQ

Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru

Download di Google PlayDownload di AppstoreDownload di App Gallery

Produk Ruangguru

Hubungi Kami

Ruangguru WhatsApp

+62 815-7441-0000

Email info@ruangguru.com

[email protected]

Contact 02130930000

02130930000

Ikuti Kami

©2025 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia