Iklan

Pertanyaan

Considering the harmful environmental effect produced by pollution, overpolution, and depletion of natural resources, numerous scholars and public’officials have called for increased urgency in motivating people to engage in pro-environmental behaviors. One significant way of meeting such calls involves our behavior as consumers. For example, people often have the option of switching from conventional products to energy-efficient or reusable “green” products. Yet, while green options are becoming more widely available, many barriers to change remain. For instance, people are notoriously reluctant to change familiar pattern of behavior, and making a switch to green behaviors often necessitates making sacrifices (e.g., playing more for a less effective product). Based on research on energy conservation in the wake of the 1970s energy crisis, researchers have continued to investigate strategies that promote conservation behaviours. However, they need to consider the underlying motivates for conservation in order to develop an effective strategy. In fact, those motivates have been identified. Each of them suggest different strategies for stimulating conservations. Therefore, public officials should choose one best strategy to conserve environment. According to an environmental concern perspective, people are assumed to engage in conservation primarily because they, at some level, basically care about the security of the planet and its inhabitants. To motivate green behavior from this perpective, an effective strategy involves better informing people about the plight of the envieonment. Accordingly, information campaigns about the dangerous state of the planet should lead people to behave in a pro-environmental fashion, ven if going green requires some sacrifice on the part of consumers. In contrast, a rational economic perpective suggest that conservation is primarily determined by economic reason. As a result, an effective way to motivate people to go green is by making green products cheaper, more efficient, and providing consumers with financial incentives (e.g., tax breaks) to buy them. The motives related to environmental concern and economic advantage can certainly spur conservation. The author highlights the harmful environmental effect followed by ....

                 Considering the harmful environmental effect produced by pollution, overpolution, and depletion of natural resources, numerous scholars and public’officials have called for increased urgency in motivating people to engage in pro-environmental behaviors. One significant way of meeting such calls involves our behavior as consumers. For example, people often have the option of switching from conventional products to energy-efficient or reusable “green” products. Yet, while green options are becoming more widely available, many barriers to change remain. For instance, people are notoriously reluctant to change familiar pattern of behavior, and making a switch to green behaviors often necessitates making sacrifices (e.g., playing more for a less effective product).

                Based on research on energy conservation in the wake of the 1970s energy crisis, researchers have continued to investigate strategies that promote conservation behaviours. However, they need to consider the underlying motivates for conservation in order to develop an effective strategy. In fact, those motivates have been identified. Each of them suggest different strategies for stimulating conservations. Therefore, public officials should choose one best strategy to conserve environment.

                According to an environmental concern perspective, people are assumed to engage in conservation primarily because they, at some level, basically care about the security of the planet and its inhabitants. To motivate green behavior from this perpective, an effective strategy involves better informing people about the plight of the envieonment. Accordingly, information campaigns about the dangerous state of the planet should lead people to behave in a pro-environmental fashion, ven if going green requires some sacrifice on the part of consumers. In contrast, a rational economic perpective suggest that conservation is primarily determined by economic reason. As a result, an effective way to motivate people to go green is by making green products cheaper, more efficient, and providing consumers with financial incentives (e.g., tax breaks) to buy them. The motives related to environmental concern and economic advantage can certainly spur conservation.

The author highlights the harmful environmental effect followed by ....

  1. describing research activities to promote conservation behaviors

  2. showing pollution, overpopulation, and depletion of natural resources 

  3. arguing for the urgency of engaging people in pro-environmental behaviors

  4. mentioning types of behaviors that support the preservation of the environment 

  5. claborating the ideas between an environmental concerns and a rational economic perspective 

Ikuti Tryout SNBT & Menangkan E-Wallet 100rb

Habis dalam

01

:

04

:

30

:

24

Iklan

N. Supriyaningsih

Master Teacher

Jawaban terverifikasi

Pembahasan

Harmful environment effect disebutkan pada kalimat pertama paragraf pertama yaitu "Considering the harmful enviromental effects produced by pollution, overpopulation and depletion of natural resources,....." kemudian, masih dalam kalimat yang sama, penulis menjelaskan "....... numerous scholars and public officials have called for increased urgency in motivating people to engage in pro-environmental behaviors ." Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa penjelasan tentang harmful environment effects diikuti pernyataantentang the urgency of engaging people in pro-environmental behaviors (C).

Harmful environment effect disebutkan pada kalimat pertama paragraf pertama yaitu "Considering the harmful enviromental effects produced by pollution, overpopulation and depletion of natural resources,..... " kemudian, masih dalam kalimat yang sama, penulis menjelaskan "....... numerous scholars and public officials have called for increased urgency in motivating people to engage in pro-environmental behaviors." Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa penjelasan tentang harmful environment effects diikuti pernyataan tentang the urgency of engaging people in pro-environmental behaviors (C).

Buka akses jawaban yang telah terverifikasi

lock

Yah, akses pembahasan gratismu habis


atau

Dapatkan jawaban pertanyaanmu di AiRIS. Langsung dijawab oleh bestie pintar

Tanya Sekarang

Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!

3

Iklan

Tanya ke AiRIS

Yuk, cobain chat dan belajar bareng AiRIS, teman pintarmu!