Animal testing is deeply divides subject, with a great deal of passion, emotion, and ideas on both sides regarding the ethic of the practice. Some individuals support animal testing and some others oppose its use.

The scientific community is strongly in favour in animal testing. The medical breakthroughs that have occurred as result of animal testing are considered reason enough to continue the practice, with the aim of reducing suffering and saving human lives. Animal testing aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatment have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines, and many more. Animal testing also helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances human use or are exposed to regularly. Scientists typically use animal for testing purpose because they are considered similiar to humans.

The contra on the issue of animal testing is that countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the rest of their lives in capacity. Many of those animals recieved tests for substances that will never actually be used for public consumption adn use. Anima testing generally costs an enermous amount of money as the animals must be fed, housed, cared for treated with drugs or experimental substances. The price of the animal themselves must also be factored into equation.

As a result of controversy, regulations and laws should be enforced. At the very least, animal suffering should be minimized and that animals should be respected during their care. If animal testing is to continue, animals must be abused.

The main idea of  paragraph 3 is ....

  1. The practice of animal testing is intolerable

  2. animals need to be fed, housed, and cared for

  3. drugs and experimental substances are useless

  4. animal testing costs enermous amount of money

  5. animal  testing causes many animal live in capacity

Y. Yuli.Widya

Master Teacher

Jawaban terverifikasi


Berdasarkan kalimat pertama, dapat diketahui bahwa paragraf tersebut berfokus pada kontra argumen dan intoleransi terhadap penggunaan hewan sebagai bahan percobaan sehingga pilihan jawaban (A) adalah yang paling tepat. Pilihan jawaban lainnya salah karena semuanya adalah supporting details dari gagasan pokok yang disampaikan.


0.0 (0 rating)

Pertanyaan serupa

Hacking: Pro and Contra? Do you know what a hacker is? A hacker is a person who enjoys exploring the details of a programmable system on computers and he or she likes to stretch the capability of the...



Jawaban terverifikasi


Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru

Produk Ruangguru

Produk Lainnya

Hubungi Kami

Ruangguru WhatsApp



Contact 02140008000


Ikuti Kami

©2022 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia