Animal testing is deeply divided subject, with a great deal of passion, emotion, and ideas on both sides regarding the ethic of the practice. Some individuals support animal testing and some others oppose its use.
The scientific community is strongly in favour in animal testing. The medical breakthroughs that have occured as a result of animal testing are considered reason enough to continue the practice, with the aim of reducing human suffering and saving human lives. Animal testing aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines, and many more. Animal testing also helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans use or are exposed to regularly. Scientists typically use animals for testing purpose because they are considered similar to humans.
The contra on the issue of animal testing is that countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the rest of their lives in captivity. Many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually be used for public consumption and use. Animal testing generally costs an enermous amount of money as the animals must be fed, housed, cared for and treated with drugs or experimental substances. The price of the animal themselves must also be factored into equation.
As a result of the controversy, regulations and laws should be enforced. At the very least, animal suffering should be minimized and that animals should be respected during their care. If animal testing is to continue, animals must be abused.
The main idea of paragraph 3 is ..........
the practice of animal testing is intolerable
animals need to be fed, housed, and cared for
drugs and experimental substances are useless
animal testing costs enormous amount of money
animal testing causes many animals live in captivity
Mahasiswa/Alumni Universitas Sebelas Maret
Berdasarkan kalimat pertama, dapat diketahui bahwa paragraf tersebut berfokus pada kontra argumen dan intoleransi terhadap penggunaan hewan sebagai bahan percobaan sehingga pilihan jawaban the practice of animal testing is intolerable adalah yang paling tepat. Pilihan jawaban lainnya salah karena semuanya adalah supporting details dari gagasan pokok yang disampaikan.
Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!
5.0 (1 rating)
Hacking: Pro and Contra? Do you know what a hacker is? A hacker is a person who enjoys exploring the details of a programmable system on computers and he or she likes to stretch the capability of t...
Hacking: Pro and Contra? Do you know what a hacker is? Well, a hacker is a person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems on computers and he or she likes to stretch the capability...
Vegetarians, about 3.2% of the US population, do not eat meat. The US Department of Agriculture does not only include meat as part of a balanced diet, but it also states that a vegetarian diet can mee...
Internet has been the most outstanding innovation in the history of mankind. As with every single innovation, the internet has its own advantages and disadvantages. The target of the internet has a...
Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860
Bantuan & Panduan
©2023 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia