Iklan

Iklan

Pertanyaan

Animal testing is a deeply divided subject, with a great deal of passion, emotion, and ideas on both sides regarding the ethics of the practice. Some individuals support animal testing and some others oppose its use. The scientific community is strongly in favor of animal testing. The medical breakthroughs that have occurred as a result of animal testing are considered reason enough to continue the practice, with the aim of reducing human suffering and saving human lives. Animal testing aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines, and many more. Animal testing also helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans use or are exposedto regularly. Scientists typically use animals for testing purpose because they are considered similar to humans. The contra on the issue of animal testing is that countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the rest of their lives in captivity. Many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually be used for public consumption and use. Animal testing generally costs an enormous amount of money as the animals must be fed, housed, cared for and treated with drugs or experimental substances. The price of the animal themselves must also be factored into the equation. As a result of the controversy, regulations and laws should be enforced. At the very least, animal suffering should be minimized and that animals should be respected during their care. If animal testing is to continue, animals must be abused. The main idea of paragraph 3 is ...

Animal testing is a deeply divided subject, with a great deal of passion, emotion, and ideas on both sides regarding the ethics of the practice. Some individuals support animal testing and some others oppose its use.

The scientific community is strongly in favor of animal testing. The medical breakthroughs that have occurred as a result of animal testing are considered reason enough to continue the practice, with the aim of reducing human suffering and saving human lives. Animal testing aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines, and many more. Animal testing also helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans use or are exposed to regularly. Scientists typically use animals for testing purpose because they are considered similar to humans.

The contra on the issue of animal testing is that countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the rest of their lives in captivity. Many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually be used for public consumption and use. Animal testing generally costs an enormous amount of money as the animals must be fed, housed, cared for and treated with drugs or experimental substances. The price of the animal themselves must also be factored into the equation.

As a result of the controversy, regulations and laws should be enforced. At the very least, animal suffering should be minimized and that animals should be respected during their care. If animal testing is to continue, animals must be abused.

The main idea of paragraph 3 is ...

  1. The practice of animal testing is intolerable.

  2. Animals need to be fed, housed, and cared for.

  3. Drugs and experimental substances are useless.

  4. Animal testing costs enormous amount of money.

  5. Animal testing causes many animals live in captivity.

Iklan

T. Tuawapat

Master Teacher

Jawaban terverifikasi

Iklan

Pembahasan

Berdasarkan kalimat pertama, dapat diketahui bahwa paragraf tersebut berfokus pada kontra argumen dan intoleransi terhadap penggunaan hewan sebagai bahan percobaan sehingga pilihan jawaban (A) adalah yang paling tepat. Pilihan jawaban lainnya salah karena semuanya adalah supporting details dari gagasan pokok yang disampaikan.

Berdasarkan kalimat pertama, dapat diketahui bahwa paragraf tersebut berfokus pada kontra argumen dan intoleransi terhadap penggunaan hewan sebagai bahan percobaan sehingga pilihan jawaban (A) adalah yang paling tepat. Pilihan jawaban lainnya salah karena semuanya adalah supporting details dari gagasan pokok yang disampaikan.

Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!

111

Iklan

Iklan

Pertanyaan serupa

Nowadays, the police have been applying tile new regulation concerning the use of seat belts. In European countries, this regulation has been applied for a long time. However, thls new regulation has ...

3

3.6

Jawaban terverifikasi

RUANGGURU HQ

Jl. Dr. Saharjo No.161, Manggarai Selatan, Tebet, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12860

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Roboguru

Coba GRATIS Aplikasi Ruangguru

Download di Google PlayDownload di AppstoreDownload di App Gallery

Produk Ruangguru

Hubungi Kami

Ruangguru WhatsApp

+62 815-7441-0000

Email info@ruangguru.com

[email protected]

Contact 02140008000

02140008000

Ikuti Kami

©2024 Ruangguru. All Rights Reserved PT. Ruang Raya Indonesia