Daphne B

04 Januari 2022 13:41

Iklan

Daphne B

04 Januari 2022 13:41

Pertanyaan

Text A Soaring carbon emissions from a meat hungry developing world could be cut back substantially by improving animal breeds and feed, according to a study. It is estimated that livestock farming contributes 1 8-5 1 per cent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. Demand for livestock products is predicted to double by 2050 as a result of growing populations, urbanization, and better income in the developing world, which will cause emissions to rise. The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, suggests that 12 per cent of total livestock-related emissions in 2030 could easily be shortened with simple improvements in production. These include: switching to more nutritious pasture grasses; supplementing livestock diets based on grass with small amounts of crop residues or grains; restoring degraded grazing lands; growing trees that trap carbon while producing leaves that livestock could eat; and adopting more productive breeds. "Organizations from the West, especially the World Watch Institute, have continued to blame livestock-keeping for being one of the major polluters of the world, yet livestock keeping's positives by far outweigh the negatives, " said Mario Herrero, co-author of the paper and a senior scientist at International Livestock Research Institute. Text B Livestock farmers in developing countries have a relatively small environ mental footprint and their animals provide them with food, income and transport for their crops, said John Byron. " What these farmers need are technological options and economic incentives that help them intensify their production in sustainable ways;' he added. Steinfeld, coordinator of the Livestock, Environment and Development Initiative at the Food and Agriculture Organization, said: "If one were able to connect this to small holder development by making poor farmers benefit through the possibility of carbon offsets and carbon markets that would indeed create a win-win situation where one would have socioeconomic benefits, targeting poor people, while reducing the carbon 'hoofprint' i. e. the carbon footprint of livestock. Improving livestock production should be done to improve livelihoods and not just for climate reasons, said Kirtana Chandraseka ran, food campaigner for friends of the Earth. She added that intensive agriculture also contributes to biodiversity loss so "it's very dangerous" just to look at lowering emissions " when there's a whole host of other factors affecting improvement in livestock farming". factors affecting livestock farming. 76. Which of following statements can be hypothetically figured out based on the information in these two texts? A. The increase in population, urbanization, and earnings leads to the higher demand for livestock consumption, and thus the higher carbon emissions. B. The significant increase in greenhouse gas emission is due to changes in people's lifestyles and activities, including the higher demand for livestock products. C. Desirable livestock farming is parallel with reduction of green house gas emissions, improvement of biodiversity, and better socioeconomic quality of the poor. D. Whatever the technological attempts are mode to improve livestock production to meet the people's demand, higher carbon emission will constantly increase. E. Although it affects positively the poor's socioeconomic status, livestock farming activities negatively influence biodiversity as well as global climate condition.

Ikuti Tryout SNBT & Menangkan E-Wallet 100rb

Habis dalam

02

:

23

:

43

:

21


3

2

Jawaban terverifikasi

Iklan

P. Parningutan

Master Teacher

06 Januari 2022 01:25

Jawaban terverifikasi

Semangat pagi, Siti! Semoga harimu menyenangkan hari ini, ya. Baik, untuk soal no.76, jawaban yang benar adalah C. Desirable livestock farming is parallel with reduction of green house gas emissions, improvement of biodiversity, and better socioeconomic quality of the poor. Kenapa ? Yuk, perhatikan penjelasan berikut ini ya, Siti. Soal ini meminta kamu untuk melakukan hipotesa pada wacana yang tersedia. Bagaimana caranya melakukan hipotesa pada wacana ini ? Pertama-tama, kamu perlu ketahui kata kunci dari pertanyaan di atas terletak pada kata "hypothetically". Dalam Bahasa Inggris, kata "hypothetically" merupakan Kata Keterangan atau Adverb yang sifatnya bermakna "If something is hypothetical, it is based on possible ideas or situations rather than actual ones." yang dalam Bahasa Indonesia berarti "Jika sesuatu bersifat hipotesis, itu bertumpu pada pemikiran atau situasi yang masuk akal ketimbang keadaan sebenarnya" Untuk menghasilkan sebuah hipotesa, kita perlu menemukan variabel atau Key Metrics (matriks utama) pada Text A dan Text B. Matriks utama yang kakak temukan antara lain sebagai berikut: Text A. Key Metrics pertama, kata Emissions, yang terdapat pada kalimat "Soaring carbon emissions from a meat hungry developing world could be cut back substantially by improving animal breeds and feed, according to a study." yang dalam Bahasa Indonesia mengandung makna "Melonjaknya emisi karbon dari negara berkembang yang kekurangan konsumsi daging dapat dikurangi secara substansial dengan meningkatkan ternak dan pakan hewan, menurut sebuah penelitian." Asumsi yang berkembang adalah: (a) Livestock farming contributes 1 8-5 1 per cent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions (Peternakan berkontribusi 18-51% terhadap emisi gas rumah kaca dunia) (b) Demand for livestock products is predicted to double by 2050. (Permintaan terhadap produk peternakan diperkirakan meningkat dua kali lipat pada tahun 2050) (c) 12 percent of total livestock-related emissions in 2030 could easily be shortened with simple improvements in production. (12 persen dari total emisi terkait peternakan pada tahun 2030 dapat dengan mudah dipersingkat dengan perbaikan sederhana dalam produksi.) (d) livestock-keeping for being one of the major polluters of the world, yet livestock keeping's positives by far outweigh the negatives. (memelihara ternak sebagai salah satu pencemar utama dunia, namun manfaat memelihara ternak jauh lebih besar daripada dampak buruknya.) Text B. Key Metrics kedua adalah Livestock yang sering disebutkan pada Text B. Asumsi atau pemikiran yang bermunculan antara lain sebagai berikut: (a) Livestock farmers in developing countries have a relatively small environmental footprint and their animals provide them with food, income and transport for their crops. (Peternak di negara berkembang memiliki cakupan lahan yang sempit dan hewan ternak menghidupi mereka dari segi makanan, pendapatan, dan transportasi untuk panen.) (b) If one were able to connect this to small holder development by making poor farmers benefit through the possibility of carbon offsets and carbon markets that would indeed create a win-win situation where one would have socioeconomic benefits, targeting poor people, while reducing the carbon 'hoofprint' i. e. the carbon footprint of livestock. (jika seseorang dapat menghubungkan ini dengan pengembangan petani kecil dengan membuat petani miskin mendapat manfaat melalui kemungkinan penyeimbangan karbon dan pasar karbon yang memang akan menciptakan situasi yang saling menguntungkan di mana seseorang akan mendapatkan manfaat sosial ekonomi, menargetkan orang miskin, sambil mengurangi karbon ' jejak kaki' contohnya jejak karbon ternak.) (c) Improving livestock production should be done to improve livelihoods and not just for climate reasons. (Meningkatkan produksi ternak harus dilakukan untuk meningkatkan mata pencaharian dan bukan hanya karena alasan iklim.) Berdasarkan Key Metrics beserta asumsi yang diutarakan di atas, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil hipotesa yang diperoleh adalah Livestock farming berbanding lurus dengan emisi gas dan yang akan memberikan pengaruh atau berkaitan secara langsung terhadap manusia dan hewan secara universal atau keseluruhan ((isu hak asasi manusia), alam (isu lingkungan), perekonomian (perhatian terhadap isu kemiskinan)dan sosial masyarakat secara khusus (dalam hal ini petani). Oleh karena itu, hasil hipotesa yang benar adalah "Desirable livestock farming is parallel with reduction of green house gas emissions, improvement of biodiversity, and better socioeconomic quality of the poor." dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut: 1. "reduction of green house gas emissions" mengacu pada asumsi yang berkembang pada Text A. 2. "improvement of biodiversity" mengacu pada manusia, hewan dan bumi sebagai keanekaragaman hayati. 3. "socioeconomic quality of the poor" mengacu pada nasib petani yang akan tertolong. Nah, hasil hipotesa ini dapat diwakilkan oleh statement pada pilihan jawaban C. Desirable livestock farming is parallel with reduction of green house gas emissions, improvement of biodiversity, and better socioeconomic quality of the poor. Demikian penjelasan yang dapat kakak berikan kepada Siti. Semoga terbantu, ya. Terima kasih. Salam Kecerdasan! Your Robo Expert


Iklan

Alif S

Level 1

28 Januari 2023 21:19

Which of the following staremenrssuow rhe authors positif attituees towqed


Buka akses jawaban yang telah terverifikasi

lock

Yah, akses pembahasan gratismu habis


atau

Dapatkan jawaban pertanyaanmu di AiRIS. Langsung dijawab oleh bestie pintar

Tanya Sekarang

Mau pemahaman lebih dalam untuk soal ini?

Tanya ke AiRIS

Yuk, cobain chat dan belajar bareng AiRIS, teman pintarmu!

Roboguru Plus

Dapatkan pembahasan soal ga pake lama, langsung dari Tutor!

Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!

Pertanyaan serupa

Whether it's the melodic sound of an Eric Clapton solo or the growl of a heavy metal band, the electric guitar has influenced popular music and culture more than any other instrument. Rock's greatest musicians have always been closely identified with their guitars. But instruments being designed for tomorrow's pop stars may look and sound rather different from today's familiar electric and acoustic guitars. Since the time when the electric guitar was invented, there have been incredible changes to the technical design of the instrument. From what was once a rounded wooden box with a hole in the front, the guitar has evolved into the smooth solid body of the rock guitarist's 'axe'. The most modern guitars are really computercontrolled synthesizers. Adolph Rickebacker's Electro String Company produced the world's first electric guitar. It was made of wood and played on the user's lap. The first real breakthrough in design came in 1950 when Leo Fender, a Californian radio repairman, made the first solid-bodied electric guitar, the Fender Telecaster. Soon after the inventor Les Paul made the famous Gibson Les Paul. Fender launched its stylish Stratocaster two years later. The guitars became standard instruments against which newer guitar designs are measured. All sorts of dift:erent materials have been used to make guitars. Acoustic guitars are made from wood, which gives a soft tone. Wood is also a popular material in electric guitar manufacture, but more modern materials such as glass and carbon fiber are also used. There have also been guitars with metal bodies and necks though these were never popular with players, who claim metal feels cold in the hand. Plastics, on the other hand, have been more used in guitar bodies. A company that makes parts for the aerospace industry has begun to use a kind of fiberglass that was originally used in helicopter blades to make the bodies for its electric-acoustic instruments. As long as scientists and musicians work together harmoniously, the electric guitar will continue to benefit from technological innovations. But for all the efforts of the guitar companies' design engineers, production managers and quality controller, it's the musicians who finally make the instruments sing- and not necessarily in the way the guitar maker intended. From the text we may conclude that ... (A) wood remains the best material for making guitars (B) guitar materials control the type of music the musicians play (C) technology has played a significant role in the design and development of guitars (D) today's designs are not very much different from those of the past (E) the use of fiberglass in aeroplanes was inspired by guitar makers

6

0.0

Jawaban terverifikasi

Everyone likes to group things. Language students group word as verbs, nouns and so on; collections of words are classified as phrases, or clauses, or sentences, and these again are reclassified according to their function. In the same way, botanistsw classify plants as algae, or fungi, or gymnosperms, etc. Zoologysts classify animals as vertrebrates and investibrates. The vetrebrates can be further classified as mammals, reptiler, birds, fish, etc. Classification enables us to keep hold of more information and, if it is based on the right data, enables us to understand better the ideas we are studying. Chemists are no exception. The chemical classification of materials, if it is based on a good system, should enable us to understand better the many substances which exist in our word. What is to be the basis of our classification? Perhaps the most obvious one is appearance. Materials could be classified as solid, liquid or gas with some mixed types as, for example, mud being solid/liquid material and steam a liquid/gas material. Appearance could enable us to subdivide our main classification groups a little further; the solid may be green, or black, powdery or crystalline; the liquid may be colored, oily, thick, or free flowing; the gas may be colored. However, we soon realize that many probably quite different materials have the same appearance. Both air and the deadly carbon-monoxide gas, are colorless, odorless gases, but we would not like to group them as the same thing. Many different liquids are colorless, water-like materials. Paragraph 2 exemplifies the idea about classification that ... . A. chemicals may be solid, liquid, and gaseous. B. Appearance is not a useful basis in chemistry. C. The use of colors is better than that of appearance. D. Both colors and appearance should be considered E. Colors should be included for identifying appearance.

4

0.0

Jawaban terverifikasi

Iklan

The word gambut (peat) is taken from the name of a village, Desa Gambut (now Garnbut sub-district), which is located about 10 km east of Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan. It is at this place that for the first time, rice has been successfully cultivated in peat soiled rice fields. In the soil taxonomy system, peat soils are grouped into a separate soil order called hisiosols, which means that the land is predominantly composed of organic soil materials in the form of remains of plant tissues. The nature and the characteristics of peat soils can be determined based on their physical and chemical properties. Gambut has dark brown to blackish colors. Although its basic materials are gray, brown or reddish, after decomposition, the dark humid compounds will appear. Furthermore, based on the weight of the contents, peat soil or gambut, which has undergone further decomposition, has a content weight ranging from 0.2 to 0 3 g cm2. Due to the low content weight, peat has a large capacity-as water storage about 2-4 times its dry weight. In fact, moss peat that has not decomposed can store up to 12 or 15 even 20 times more water than its own weight. In addition, peat soil has a large absorption area, which is up to 4 times greater than montmorillonite clay. Next, peat soil has acidic reaction properties. Decomposition of organic matters will produce organic acids that accumulate in the bodv of the soil hence increasing the acidity of the peat soil. Generally, peat soil shows real resistance to changes in pH when compared to mineral soils. As a result, peat soil requires more limestone to increase the pH at the same level of the value of mineral soil. Thus, peat soil requires a higher dose of fertilizers than mineral soil. Furthermore, based on the nutrients contained in it, peal soil is a type of nutrient-poor soil. High levels of N and organic matters in peat soils are also accompanied by a high N nitrification process so that the activity of heterotrophic organisms is not well stimulated and the organisms active in the nitrification process can carry out (heir activities. Therefore, the levels of P (phosphorus) and K (potassium) of peat soils are generally lower than that of the mineral soils. Also, the plants cultivated on the peat soil are very responsive to the fertilization using P and K. (adapted fiom hilps://freelearningji.wordpress.com} The phrase * large capacity as water storage* in paragraph 2 can be replaced by ... A. Power to withstand heavy water currents B. Capacity to keep water flowing stable C. High quality and quantity of water D. Potential to make large water storage E. Ability to deposit a large amount of water

1

0.0

Jawaban terverifikasi

Many modern educational experts claim that teaching facts and academic skills is less important than achieving other social objectives. For some liberals, the schools must first change attitudes or provide nurturing in place of failed families or help establish equality and social justice. For some conservatives, the school must first prepare kids for the workplace by molding them into supple corporate citizens, while others want the focus to be on family values, a competitive spirit, or other social or behavioral objectives. But the idea of simply educating kids seems to have taken a backseat to most educational experts and administrators. They miss the point that kids with real academic skills, especially skills in reading, writing, and mathematics, are more likely to overcome social barriers, more likely to have genuine self esteem, and most likely to be genuinely prepared for the challenges of life and the workplace. By emphasizing so many things besides a genuine, classical education, tile educational establishment tends to soli our kids short and bring about many of the problems they claim to be solving. Consider the case of Wesley Elemontary School in Houston. According to Richard Nadlor in the article, "Failing Grade", Wesley has all the demographic markers of a school bound for failure. Over 80% of the students qualify for subsidized lunches, and nearly all are minorities (92% black, 7% Hispanic). Yet it ranks among the best schools of Houston, with first-graders placing at the 82nd percentile level in reading tests which is 50 points higher than the expected level for similar at-risk schools. What has made Wesley so successful? The answer is classical education in the form of Direct Instruction curriculum designed by Siegfried Engelmann, an example of the much ridiculed "sage-onthe-stage" approach. This Direct Instruction system boosts reading, writing, and math scores by 30 to 40 percentile points in at-risk schools. Sadly, Engelmann, like others who successfully challenge popular fads in educational reform, has been rejected by much of the educational establishment. His success is an embarrassment to them. Given the baseline score in reading is 23 percentile points, which of the following most likely reflects the maximum impact of Direct Instruction on the students learning achievement in Wesley Elementary School? A. 45 B. 53 C. 63 D. 85 E 95

4

5.0

Jawaban terverifikasi