Aura F

21 Januari 2022 09:18

Iklan

Aura F

21 Januari 2022 09:18

Pertanyaan

Firstly, the accused needed money. He was in debt, owing to the bank over $100.000. He had no chance of repaying this: therefore, he needed quick money. That's why he stole the Macquire Diamond.     Secondly, the accused had the opportunity. As a security guard he could come and go from the exhibition of the diamond without causing suspicion. He had plenty of time on the night of the robbery to take the diamond, hide it and then return to his post before the next guard came on duty.     Finally, the accused had the ability to take the Macquire Diamond. He had knowledge of the alarm system and had keys to unlock the display case. On this evidence you had no other choice but to find him guilty. The prosecution proves that the security guard was guilty because .... a. he was on duty when the diamond was stolen b. Macquire Diamond is very expensive c. he had got big amount of money d. he had the diamond with him e. he broke the alarm system

Ikuti Tryout SNBT & Menangkan E-Wallet 100rb

Habis dalam

02

:

13

:

15

:

03

Klaim

6

1

Jawaban terverifikasi

Iklan

Y. Widya

Mahasiswa/Alumni Universitas Negeri Surabaya

22 Januari 2022 02:22

Jawaban terverifikasi

Jawaban: a. he was on duty when the diamond was stolen Hello Aura, Kamu diminta untuk menjawab pertanyaan ini berdasarkan teks yang tersedia. Pertanyaan "The prosecution proves that the security guard was guilty because . . ." berarti "Penuntut membuktikan bahwa satpam itu bersalah karena . . ." Coba perhatikan makna kutipan berikut ini: "Kedua, terdakwa memiliki kesempatan. Sebagai satpam, dia bisa datang dan pergi dari pameran berlian tanpa menimbulkan kecurigaan. Dia punya banyak waktu pada malam perampokan untuk mengambil berlian, menyembunyikannya dan kemudian kembali ke posnya sebelum penjaga berikutnya datang bertugas. Terakhir, terdakwa memiliki kemampuan untuk mengambil Macquire Diamond. Dia memiliki pengetahuan tentang sistem alarmnya dan memiliki kunci untuk membuka etalasenya. Berdasarkan bukti ini anda tidak punya pilihan lain selain menetapkan dia bersalah." Berdasarkan makna tersebut, dapat diasumsikan bahwa satpam itu terbukti bersalah karena dia sedang bertugas saat berlian itu dicuri (he was on duty when the diamond was stolen) dan dia juga memiliki pengetahuan tentang sistem alarmnya, serta memiliki kunci untuk membuka etalasenya. Dengan demikian, jawaban yang benar adalah a. he was on duty when the diamond was stolen. Semoga mudah dipahami ya penjelasannya, terima kasih telah menggunakan Roboguru.


Iklan

Mau pemahaman lebih dalam untuk soal ini?

Tanya ke AiRIS

Yuk, cobain chat dan belajar bareng AiRIS, teman pintarmu!

Chat AiRIS

LATIHAN SOAL GRATIS!

Drill Soal

Latihan soal sesuai topik yang kamu mau untuk persiapan ujian

Cobain Drill Soal

Perdalam pemahamanmu bersama Master Teacher
di sesi Live Teaching, GRATIS!

Pertanyaan serupa

Task 2 Read the dialogue below. Then, state whether the sentences below are true (T) or false (F). Donna : Hi! Come in! Walter : Hi Donna. Thank you. Donna : How are you, pal? Walter : Terrific. Last week, I won the chess championship. Donna : Oh. It's great. Congratulation! Walter : Thank you. Next month I'll represent Indonesia in the World Championship. Donna : Really? I have no doubt on your capability. You have shown talent ever since we were in the elementary school. Walter: How about you? Still writing? Donna : Yes, I am working on my second novel. Walter : I think you've proven yourself as a good novelist. Donna : Thank you for your compliment. Walter : I'm sure one day your novel will be read by many people in the world. Donna : You think so? Walter : Of course, I do. 5. She is finishing her third novel. (.......)

78

0.0

Jawaban terverifikasi